shvarz: (with bush)
[personal profile] shvarz
Все подумали, а Кусинич сказал (про Буша):
"I seriously believe we have to start asking questions about his mental health. There's something wrong. He does not seem to understand his words have real impact. You cannot be a President of the United States who's wanton in his expression of violence. There's a lot of people who need care. He might be one of them. If there isn't something wrong with him, then there's something wrong with us."

Date: 2007-10-31 01:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] m-p.livejournal.com
так многие из нас все это давно говорили - с мужиком не все в порядке. проблема в том, что для других, которых тоже немало, это не просто нормально, а желаемо - чтобы President of the United States was wanton in his expression of violence. К кому Кусинич апеллирует? К церковному хору?

Date: 2007-10-31 01:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mikelina.livejournal.com
//If there isn't something wrong with him, then there's something wrong with us."//

Ну уж нет!
If there is something so obviously wrong with him, then there's definitely something wrong with us.
Так вернее. Мы (в щироком смысле слова "мы") его ДВА раза выбрали президентом. Бачили очи що купували

Date: 2007-10-31 04:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shvarz.livejournal.com
Я то согласен, но даже такой клоунский претендент как Кусинич понимает, что не стоит обзывать 50% избирателей сумасшедшими :)

Date: 2007-10-31 04:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] boriskogan.livejournal.com
Considering Kucinich has had UFO encounters AFAIR, there's definitely something wrong with "us," i.e., him and his supporters.

Date: 2007-10-31 04:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] boriskogan.livejournal.com
And considering that Congress voted approvals of his "wanton" acts of violence in Iraq and Afghanistan, Kucinich is being very dupliciotous in not suggesting that it's time to start asking questions about the mental health of those congressmembers.

Of course, labelling your democratically elected political opponents as mentally diseased is a general sign of douchebaggery, but it IS very convenient-you really don't have to rationally explain what it is that you find objectionable about their reasoning and actions. The time-honored ad hominem argument.

Date: 2007-10-31 06:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shvarz.livejournal.com
Of course, labelling your democratically elected political opponents as mentally diseased is a general sign of douchebaggery

I agree with that. This is the reason I highlighted the last sentence and not the first or second.

Date: 2007-10-31 12:26 pm (UTC)

March 2022

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 24th, 2026 11:30 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios